Electronic Voting Machines Whistle Blower

kesmeby Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - So by your logic whoever has the most dollars gets the most votes. Which IS how it works right now, but I'd like to keep working toward something better.

shadora123 Says:

Aug 22, 2008 - What ever happened after this testimony? I mean I just watched on CNN that the company "Premier Election Solutions" formally "Diebold" admitting to the fraud...er uhm...I mean "problem". And now this gentleman. States are asking for paper voting and they are not letting them. What the hell! These bastards need to be accountable for such rigging. Bush, Condi, Cheney , the entire administration and its goons. This is just ridiculous all this time wasted. CNN & Diebold: /watch?v=HL3VyifXCEc

SPHINXMENREECE Says:

Aug 28, 2008 - GREAT PERSPECTIVE

jbirey Says:

Aug 30, 2008 - Stephanie Tubbs Jones is the only Congressional Rep I hear in this investigation. And now she's dead. How convenient.

Isaiah6twothrueight Says:

Oct 7, 2008 - Everyone just puts their fingers in their ears and yells "blah blah blah" at the top of their lungs. Like zombies on their way to the polls..."We're Screwed '08"

pegasustrio Says:

Oct 8, 2008 - gee and how ironic it just happened to occur in the state brother dearest manages. if this were us in a corporation we would get fired.

buzzzcreator Says:

Oct 9, 2008 - Seems to be a no brainer that Obama would legally win, but what will the U.S do if McCain gets in via rigged voting machines??? Would you all just sit back and take it AGAIN?

dutboku Says:

Oct 16, 2008 - This is frightening. Why is that man, whoever he was at the time Florida Secretary of State and now congressman , asked for that computer program that could rig an election is not being interviewed by FBI or we do not see some real investigative reporting from the so called journalists. What are we to do as citizens, we keep signing petitions and more petitions for paper ballots. It is a Silent Wall. Who Is Representing US? Is it going to be ONE MORE STOLEN ELECTION?

musikatephilly Says:

Oct 19, 2008 - I just wrote to the governer of my state to ask why we still have voting machines. Citizens...get out there and demand your enfranchisement!

musikatephilly Says:

Oct 19, 2008 - Impossible to keep up with who just bought whom. You may think you're boycotting one company and buy some generic product made in the same plant.

musikatephilly Says:

Oct 19, 2008 - Not funny in this death-centric warmongering state.

musikatephilly Says:

Oct 19, 2008 - no. fascist.

kingrexrex666 Says:

Oct 19, 2008 - HAHA...UR ALL FUCKED....

ejasiewicz Says:

Oct 19, 2008 - You said it.

caucusjunkietwo3 Says:

Oct 20, 2008 - no one in the stae should vote..If its been proven in courts that a programmer intentionally programmed voting outcomes...then it should be mad illegal.If not dont vote have a vote out day so that the voters will not be accountilbe nor rresponsible for it..We need to take back our power in this country...our rights.Yes we have the right to vote but we als have the right not to vote for fraud.

GrandGuignologist Says:

Oct 22, 2008 - The news is already suppressing stories that might make their candidate look bad. they falsly report the pole numbers. they will hack electronic voting machines, and obama will win.

chmorley Says:

Oct 26, 2008 - Interesting theory. How did all of the corporate parties (e.g., Republican-backed Diebold) who have been working on behalf of Republicans and now support McCain decide to work for Obama? And how do the tens of competing pollsters all conspire to show a similar large margin for Obama? Typically in plausible conspiracy theories, the ones with the power rigging the outcome benefit from the fraudulent outcome. Why would they act against their own self-interests?

GrandGuignologist Says:

Oct 26, 2008 - It was all a fake. The truth is the Dems cryed recount on a very close race. they made a big deal about hanging chads, and even tryed to have the military absentee ballots thrown out. the count still came out Bush. afterward they cryed for reform, and the Diebold was born, Then went on a smear campain. for eight years they did everything in their power to make people hate Bush. even to the point of making a cartoon to humiliate him. they knew the fools would fall right in line. end phase two.

chmorley Says:

Oct 27, 2008 - Interesting theory. A couple of problems with it: 1) The recount was never completed (thanks to the Supreme Court); 2) Diebold CEO, Wally O'Dell, a loyal Republican, vowed he "would do anything to ensure President Bush gets re-elected; Again, I still don't understand how in this scenario the conspirators (embodied by Diebold and other Repub-owned vote-counting machine companies) benefit from the conspiracy. What's their motive? It's hard to square this theory with the facts.

CoastalFlyFish Says:

Oct 28, 2008 - I'm not american and not familiar with this trial.. Could someone please tell me, what name this dispute might go by? - So I can look further into it on my own.. thanks.

connoisseurodg Says:

Nov 2, 2008 - The company he worked for (Yang Enterprise Inc.) has already said his claims were untrue BUT refused to go on record and refute any claims he made. What that means is: "Unofficially" he is lying. I don't know, if they have nothing to hide - why wouldn't they go on record??? Hmmmm... Well what do I know, I'm just your average gullible American - Ooh! Look! Paris Hilton is on TV! Gotta go!

GrandGuignologist Says:

Nov 2, 2008 - First it was decided in the Supreme Court because the Dems sued. 2 they approved the machines only because they already knew they could hack it.

Clanmemberkalvin Says:

Nov 4, 2008 - lol... It's not surprising that this video has less than 20,000 views... Ah.. we just continue sleeping...We're going to wake up in a world we don't wanna be in.

happosai21 Says:

Nov 6, 2008 - well manipulating an election is the whole purpose of a voting computer lol ^^ what do you expect?

colincky Says:

Nov 7, 2008 - why dosent this surprize me. bet the little terrorist BUSH used this.