Guitar Pachelbel by JerryC(張逸帆) on TV in Taiwan

yashil17 Says:

Jul 3, 2008 - i'm the airhead? ur oppinion man, it's ur choice to show urself like this, so i'm not going to waste my time replying to u, cause 1.ur full of bull and 2. u can't type English

AngrySylvest Says:

Jul 3, 2008 - YOUR A BITCH

giacom9222 Says:

Jul 7, 2008 - anyone can translate?

alyu100tw Says:

Jul 10, 2008 - there's no logic in your comment in the first place. So.. fuck you.

yashil17 Says:

Jul 10, 2008 - oh my god, do u even know what logic means? obviously no, because if u did then u wouldn't be attacking me with shit bs

alyu100tw Says:

Jul 11, 2008 - alright smart guy, care to define what logic is and how your comment have any logic whatsoever?'shit bs?', shit bullshit?

yashil17 Says:

Jul 14, 2008 - ok, logic is comon sense, it's the fact of one doing something right which comes mostly from the brain, it may however, come from expirience. ok , now tell me which of my comment is ological, smart one. and now it's ur turn to explain to me the difinition of logic. douche

alyu100tw Says:

Jul 15, 2008 - Logic - reasonable judgement and thought.Now let's evaluate your 'logic' shall we?"i think that both these fags suck shit for fucking up a wonderful piece created by a great composer and also fucking up the musical term itself"You assume these two are homosexuals when there is no indication. Quite illogical. You say they suck feces, because they had sexual intercourse with a piece of composition. Alrighty.. Then you go on saying they fuck up the 'musical term'? Of??I rest my case.

yashil17 Says:

Jul 15, 2008 - ok then, there might be no indications of them being homosexual, but there is no indication that they r no homosexual. wrong, i did not say that they r having sexual intercoarse WITH the piece, i said that they r "fucking up" the canon, so thus, they r "ruining" the piece. and, if u had any knowledge of musical theory, u would've understood what i meant, just like jerry c, and the other one. a canon is a form of music, it is a repeation of 2 or more instruments playing a same piece, continued

yashil17 Says:

Jul 15, 2008 - starting at diffrent times, now these stupid ppl don't know the term and, thus, play Johann Christoph Pachelbel's canon with an electric guitar (Solo) and call it Johann Christoph Pachelbel's Canon

alyu100tw Says:

Jul 16, 2008 - true that, I never claimed they were heterosexuals. So what justification do you have for calling them fags?"Pachelbel's Canon" is a piece of music written by Johann Pachelbel. Jerry C drew inspiration from the piece and arranged the music for the electric guitar. Calling it 'Canon Rock' because the music was drawn from Pachelbel's music. Doesn't mean it has to follow the canon structure.Any questions?

yashil17 Says:

Jul 16, 2008 - no, first u claim of some evidence that these two r staight. 2. Pachelbel's canon is not a piece of music, it is a canon, do u understand?3. jerry c may have arranged it for AN elecetric guitar, but since he didn't know what canon meant, so he just named his arrangment canon rock, which he should've called it Pachelbel's canon, BECAUSE HE WAS MAKING AN ARRANGEMENT4. And it does meant that he has to follow the canon sturucture OF PACHELBEL, BECAUSE IT'S AND ARRANGMENT, DOUCHE

alyu100tw Says:

Jul 16, 2008 - Okay douchebag, let me explain to you.You claimed they were homosexuals. I never claimed anything. So you provide evidence that these two are homosexuals. I dont provide anything because I didn't claim anything. You understand?Secondly, Pachelbel's Canon is a piece of music. He wrote a piece of music in the canon structure and named it "Pachelbel's Canon".Jerry C took INSPIRATION from "Pachelbel's Canon" and named it "Canon Rock". Therefore it only needs to sound like it. Okay fucktard?

yashil17 Says:

Jul 19, 2008 - fine then, 1. they could be homosexuals or straight, but there's no evidence for both of them, so thus, i was wrong and u r also wrong, comprend? 2. true that this is a piece of music, but when u want to talk about music, u go more specific, so u say what form of music it is, so then u say canon, so in other words u say it's a canon.3. but u said that jerry c arranged it for electric guitar, didn't u?

yashil17 Says:

Jul 19, 2008 - 3.and i also he did arrange the brilliant canon of Johann Pachelbel, and thus, it has to use the CANON SRUCTURE, it's like composing a mineut without a rythme of 3/4 time, u can't do that or it would not be a mineut, it won't matter if it sounds the same, if u r going to do a canon then it must follow the rules of a canon, it says jerry c's canon rock, so therefore it musit apply the rules of a canon and also the rules of rock music, in which u am not aware of, got it dumbshit?

alyu100tw Says:

Jul 20, 2008 - Why am I wrong? I didn't claim if they were straight OR gay, fuckwit.NO, THE PIECE OF MUSIC IS CALLED "PACHELBEL'S CANON". IT IS CALLED THAT BECAUSE IT'S IN CANON STRUCTURE. Jerry C's 'Canon Rock' is not a canon, it's a piece of arrangement INSPIRED BY "PACHELBEL'S CANON". IT DOESN'T NEED TO BE A CANON. Im outta here dude. Your intelligence is obviously not enough to continue this argument. Peace out douchebag ;)

yashil17 Says:

Jul 20, 2008 - 1.will then what do u think these two are? 2. ok if ur have already started to talk about Pachelbel's canon then u don't have to call it "Pachelbel's canon", becauyse u r only talking about that particular canon, do u finally understand? and also i have proved that this is a called canon and not a piece of music if ur talking about a specific piece.3. ok then, 1) it's an "inspiation" of Pachelbel's canon, then isn't Johann Pachelbel's canon a canon? continued

yashil17 Says:

Jul 20, 2008 - 2) isn't jerry c arrangement a canon?3) so jerry c arranged Pachelbel's canon, right? ur resigning this fight? COWARD, douche

ilikeshred Says:

Aug 20, 2008 - What's wrong with calling an adaptation of a canon, Canon Rock? Their are plenty of title called Canon who ISN'T a canon! angry because the old traditions isn't respected? Jerry C Called it Canon Rock. Period, If you are not happy with this Go cry more! You don't like rock/metal? then don't listen a ROCK adaptation of a song! Anyway cry more stupid! if you answer my comment by arguing me... Please don't REPEAT ANY of the argument you used! I ALREADY READ THEM AND I FOUND THEM FREAKING STUPIDS!

aznprincess4eva Says:

Sep 12, 2008 - damn what's with all the haters? can't you just respect the music?

danielyeh Says:

Sep 14, 2008 - wow you're a douche.canon in d he called it canon rock. big deal. he took a song called canon in d and made it his own. he can call it w/e the fuck he wants.

danielyeh Says:

Sep 14, 2008 - its not a canon of anything.it was just inspired by it. as you hear in the melody. you're like one of those douchebags complaining about how sparking wine isn't champange. get over yourself

BOILY128 Says:

Sep 19, 2008 - you need help!!!

L0kd0Wn Says:

Sep 27, 2008 - hes hot

ObligationX Says:

Sep 30, 2008 - 作么酱讲funtwo呢 =.=他有玩 sweet child o'mine xD