Share Video
Download Video: Click Here (save as ***.flv) | Real Player or any FLV Player Required
Permalink:
Embed Code:
Bookmark
mchoudhari Says:
Nov 3, 2008 - How do you explain that the building No.7 collapsed later that evening even no air plane hit that building. Guess what all three buildings were owned by one person, Larry Silverstein, he collected 7bn from insurance.
tkwilson1970 Says:
Nov 4, 2008 - Most of the back end of building 7 was ripped down by the falling WTC. This caused fires in the building, and caused it fall exactly the same way. It was weakened very badly by debri from WTC, and then fires inside softened steel and it collapsed. It was not a controlled demolition before you tell me that, it takes months to set one up, and you wouldn't be able to hide it.Just get a grip on reality. I really wish conspiratists could be put to death. It is a slur on all those people that died.
mchoudhari Says:
Nov 4, 2008 - God bless you, scientists from Harvard do not agree, they are not concern about twin towers they are puzzled about building No.7. There several buildings were right below the towers, they did not collapse the structure held up but building no.7 collapsed free fall on its own all three buildings were owned by a same person who collected insurance of 7bn and he insured buildings against terrorism few weeks before the attack.
tkwilson1970 Says:
Nov 4, 2008 - Given that the WTC was attacked in the 1990s it would have been prudent to insure against terrorism. Any smart business man would have performed that risk assessment. As a risk analyst I would have advised that.Building 7 did not fall at free fall. That would have taken 3.6 seconds, it took 7. For a controlled demolition, you have to prep the inside, taking out walls, arranging timers and charge wires, partially cutting steel supports. It takes months. How would that have been kept secret?
mhcblues22 Says:
Nov 9, 2008 - that's simply kinetic energy transfered into heat energy. how were the terrorists going to hit an exact mark o the WTC? they was no giant red X on the building. even though it still is stupid, it would make more sense to say weapons were placed on the plane. but even that's retarded. learn your laws of physics.
HerrKuhn928 Says:
Nov 10, 2008 - Yeah, I mean this whole thing must have been cleverly planned...they must have planned it really well to have the plane hit the building at the exact spot where the explosives were located. How many more uneducated idiots subscribe to this theory? I love all the armchair experts on this stuff. Are we expected to beleive a theory like this while showing photos of a plane slamming the building at 400+ MPH? There were no nigh speed cameras on it.
tomshorts07 Says:
Nov 10, 2008 - hey mhcblues and herrkuhn, did either one of you realize that the airliners have computer controlled piloting systems? 757's like the 2 that crashed, all used the very accurate computer aided autopilots during normal operation, and as an industry insider, i know that it is not that difficult to reprogram the flight controls for these systems. there may be some 'armchair experts', my friend, but some of us do know a thing or two...asswipe
Phantom2487 Says:
Nov 11, 2008 - IT WAS THE FREAKING LANDING LIGHTS YOU DAMN MORONS, your theory is EPIC FAIL.Now go put your foil hats on and keep drinking the funny Cool Aide.--duh
HerrKuhn928 Says:
Nov 11, 2008 - Tom...I'm an engineer and fully aware most of the new planes can even be made to land themselves if needed. Some even use the auto-land features (Alaska used it). But...all of that can be turned off by the pilot. You 9-11 conspiricy people need to find something productive to do with your lives, get a job, go to college, mop the floor, but stop putting down your country by spewing what is nothing more than hearsay. If the US government is such a bad thing, then just leave the country.
Deckerd724 Says:
Nov 12, 2008 - The flash at impact looks like the nose hitting the building at 590 mph. If you hit anything hard enough, it will make sparks.
Gettheledoutstyle Says:
Nov 12, 2008 - fuck all u nieve muther fuckers.. i am a conspiracy theorist not out of fun but out of love for my country and my hate for the government .. they were behind 9/11 and ive done a ton of research and all u fags who say conspiracy theorists should die.,ill say it rite back at all the nieve fucks out there.
Gettheledoutstyle Says:
Nov 12, 2008 - why dont u fucks go do some research first then ull see what im talking about.. saying something you have NO clue about is what pisses me off of all the conspiracy theorist haters,. just nieve assholes who dont have open minds.. this government wanted a reason to go to war to make money and bush is quoted as saying to paul oneill sec of treasury find me a way to do this.. he wasnt going to stop at anything to be able to get the publics consent to go to war.. it sickens me the arrogance of people
draken02 Says:
Nov 13, 2008 - BUSH IS A TERRORIST
stargirlnatasha Says:
Nov 15, 2008 - bin laden is staying in the white house's guest room..i bet you anything hes somewhere in the states.
misterlach Says:
Nov 16, 2008 - ok ok i live in australia but i saw this mest up shit happen and the second i saw it i said to mesalf this was bush i bet u anythingy this was all bushes folt
mboress Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - the zoomed in shot isn't clear nor convincing.the nose of the plane is the most probable cause of what appears to be disinigration of glass before entry. the momentum and weight factors at the moment of impact indicate the natural wake caused by the plane itself caused the disturbance before impact. the angle of the shot clarifies nothing abnormal except to those that wish it to be.
NWOxSLAYER Says:
Nov 19, 2008 - bin laden is dead watch a vid called " butto says bin laden is dead"
britishareawesome69 Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - 911 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB!!!!!! None of you theories make any sence and aren't true. LOL there is much more evidence that shows it was not an inside job. LOL, this is my favorite, " they must have planted bombs in the building, because how could it have colapsed", lol A PLANE FLEW INTO THE BUILDING IT'S OBVIOUS HOW IT FELL. STOP TRYING TO GO AROUND THAT. GET A LIFE!!!!!!!!
fillyferz Says:
Nov 26, 2008 - If your some teenager who thinks what you say is pertanent because your parents have kissed your ass and told you how fucking great you are for so many years then just shut up,,,you guys repeat the same worthless crap that doesn't make sense and think it's the last word,,you don't have a clue about engineering or physics,,NONE of you duhbunker assholes have EVER used a technical term properly or in text
timmygunz18 Says:
Nov 26, 2008 - Of course the theories make sense. The building was designed to withstand a plane crashing into it. Regardless of the plane's sheer mass and momentum, the strucuture's integral web of vertically positioned pillars (really thick steel/iron) could wistand that kind of force. It's very simple if you think about it. Even when a plane would go through the building, the building would not tumble down upon itself - it's not designed to.
timmygunz18 Says:
Nov 26, 2008 - Each floor is supported by the same columns of incredibly flexible and thick steel/iron, yet are INDEPENDENTLY supported - so why would damaged floors fall through undamaged floors, seeing as the building can easily support its own mass? Regardless of who did, or didn't for that matter, there's more to the story - the plane alone cannot be blamed for the towers falling... not according to physics on this Earth.
worm9100 Says:
Nov 27, 2008 - is it just me or does this guy sound like Morpheus from the matrix seriously though
kensmind Says:
Nov 28, 2008 - You're wrong. The U.S. government has NOW admitted that on the very day of 911 the military was engaged in SEVERAL training exercises to "simulate what would happen if terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into public buildings." At the VERY LEAST, what we have is a COMPROMISED exercise and an inside job. We have CLEAR EVIDENCE of traitors in the government's admission of those military exercises... or do YOU believe that it was a just a one in ten trillion coincidence?
planet7news Says:
Nov 30, 2008 - I'm surprised Glaxo don't spam these videos. So many paranoids on medication congregate here.
tkwilson1970 Says:
Nov 2, 2008 - So, people are arguing that 9-11 was a controlled demolition. If the flashes were explosions to bring down the tower, then why did they not collapse until 60 minutes later. Surely if the flashes were the charges for the inside job the towers would have collapsed straight away.