Cambodia Khmer Rouge 1975 to 1979

mrgooofy Says:

Sep 30, 2008 - Pol Pot was not a communistic, he was a psychopathic

mrgooofy Says:

Sep 30, 2008 - Pol Pot was not a communistic he was a psychopathic

killer00630 Says:

Oct 13, 2008 - What is Pol Pot? anyone...?

HavinThangz Says:

Oct 17, 2008 - vietnam only step in cause in 1979 Khmer rouge was killin 100 of thousand of vietnamese in south vietnam. They Did not overthrown the khmer rouge cus they wanna save the cambodian races, they only did it cause their vietnamese was gettin kill. Vietnamese was next on the khmer rouge hitlist then after that the thai was next. Khmer rouge wanted to took over the whole Southeat asia, but vietnam stop it.

tobiawomad917 Says:

Oct 23, 2008 - Need some extra attention down there? Get it with me !!!FASTLOVERFUN(DOT)(COM)

alifshinobi Says:

Oct 27, 2008 - Thank you for posting it up.

eviltreemonster Says:

Nov 1, 2008 - It wasn't just intellectuals and buddhists that were killed. Christians, homosexuals and Muslims were also in open season for these animals.

markymui Says:

Nov 8, 2008 - It's really pride for Vietnam history. Only one Country on the world can win China,Yuan, France, USA ,Thailand ,Khmer Rouge ,that's Vietnam. They can win them because they love peace!

nauselom Says:

Nov 9, 2008 - Another ignorant anti-communist video.

MEBroadcasted Says:

Nov 10, 2008 - I think Karl Marx is the world's biggest fool. He's the one who started this mess in the first place.

cooper91 Says:

Nov 16, 2008 - how dare you.

Amoneth Says:

Nov 16, 2008 - Pol Pot does not understand-he took it literally.Socialism is good, but different to be implemented.

nauselom Says:

Nov 17, 2008 - dare I what?.. speak the truth? Not one of these videos attempts to reveal why Pol Pot did what he did and why people supported them.DO you think revolutions would be won if people like Pol Pots idealology and agenda was to "kill everyone, and take your money", not at all. You think the Khmer Rouge soldiers just shot people cause Pol Pot said so? No, not without a justification, or a mission.Lets elarn about what the Khmer Rouge was and why people followed it, not who they killed.

dinh08 Says:

Nov 21, 2008 - killing innocent lives is already wrong. if pol pot was truly educated, he would've figured a more nonviolent and intellectual way to accomplish his goals. & if what im saying is wrong, then why is it pol pot's attempt of refining Cambodia was unsuccessful. not only should we educate ourselves about the khmer rouge and find out their purpose but also find our common sense in the types of actions we should make. pol pot basically tried to copy the holocaust, which hitler was ALSO not successful.

K2Karakoram Says:

Nov 24, 2008 - LOL!! what a bunch of crap. When people did follow Pol Pot they followed him for the same reason people followed Stalin. UNBELIEVABLE MIND BOGGLING FEAR. You think those 1.7 million killed as a result of KR policies were justified?

K2Karakoram Says:

Nov 24, 2008 - actually by 1977 the KR was killing people for almost anything imaginable. Their paranoia even eclipsed Stalin's. You could have been even the most orthodox maoist and they still would have killed you. This was especially true in 1978 when their revolution really turned on their own big time in unimaginable paranoia.

eviltreemonster Says:

Nov 24, 2008 - Well thank you for sharing this. I didn't know that. As for kicking these "human" trash out, we have the Vietnamese to thank for that. Take care.

K2Karakoram Says:

Nov 24, 2008 - Ya even though the Vietnamese communists have their own "sins" we could talk about I do credit them HEAVILY for kicking out the KR. Who knows how much worse things would have been without their invasion.

eviltreemonster Says:

Nov 24, 2008 - Communism does have its advantages. It stops all this religious extremist nonsense for one thing and allows people a bit more freedom then an Imperialist Theocracy like Iran or Saudi Arabia. They preach violence against non beleivers, women and homosexuals. The Khmer Rouge and the Vietcong may have done some evil things but Islamist groups like the Taliban and theUnion of Islamic Courts are equally evil and corrupt.

K2Karakoram Says:

Nov 24, 2008 - 1) You can't claim one the one hand it allows for "a bit more freedom" on the one hand and then say 'stops all this religious extremist nonsense" on the other. Forbidding religion (whether extremist or not which communism does) is not an argument for freedom

K2Karakoram Says:

Nov 24, 2008 - 2) If evil is to be judged by the magnitude of mass murder then the KR was much more evil than any islamic theocracy of today. The KR's murderous 3.5 years was every bit as bad (probably worse) than the NAZIs or Staling reign of terror relative to time and % of population. Only the mass murder in Rwanda and maybe east timor was worse relative to % of population and time.

K2Karakoram Says:

Nov 24, 2008 - the bottom line is "communism" has a track record of mind boggling mass murder. Lets be against all form of totalitarianism whether its communism, fascism or islamic theocracies.

BfutureC Says:

Nov 24, 2008 - Pol Pot is the true khmer hero. During his regime, Cambodia didnt lose anything to foreign countries, not even a small sand. Cambodia's boundary was still the same. Cambodia's forest was still the same.

eviltreemonster Says:

Nov 25, 2008 - Yeah but you know what I mean. Islamists are EVIL.

nauselom Says:

Nov 25, 2008 - K2K, don't be stupid, people don't follow leaders out of fear.If a small gang of peasents wanted to run your country do you support them otu of fear? No! I mean, what can they do to you? Nothing.Point being he had to get to his position somehow. Study why this is, then come back and open your mouth.